Primary record · PRC meeting scheduled for August 6, 2026

4076-4080 Lafayette Place — Project Review Committee Comments

At a glance

Culver City's Project Review Committee comments for case P2026-0156, a Site Plan Review, Density Bonus and Lot Merger application for 4076-4080 Lafayette Place. The document describes demolition of existing improvements on two adjacent parcels and a proposed six-story, 70,678-square-foot, 40-unit residential building with 44 parking spaces, including three Very Low-Income and three Moderate-Income units. As of the July 30 comments, the application was deemed incomplete.

If the embedded PDF does not load completely, open it in a new window.

What the record shows

Key facts

Amount
$12,000,000 estimated project valuation
Address
4076-4080 Lafayette Place
Documented amounts
$12,000,000 estimated project valuation
Case Number
P2026-0156
Application Type
Site Plan Review, Density Bonus, Lot Merger
Application Status
Deemed incomplete in July 30, 2026 PRC comments
Sb330 Preliminary Application Date
2026-02-18
Proposed Building
6 stories; 70,678 square feet
Proposed Units
40 residential units
Affordable Units
3 Very Low-Income units and 3 Moderate-Income units
Parking Spaces
44
Estimated Project Valuation
$12,000,000
Projected Net New Daily Trips
204
Vmt Review
Further VMT impact analysis not required under the City's stated 250-daily-trip threshold
What the emails document

Source-grounded findings

Planning identifies the application as incomplete and states that, after a complete resubmittal, staff would prepare a report and schedule a Planning Commission public hearing within 60 to 90 days with a 21-day public-comment period.

The source says an SB 330 preliminary application was submitted February 18, 2026 and describes the vesting and resubmittal consequences associated with that filing.

The proposed project would demolish existing improvements on two adjacent parcels and construct a six-story, 70,678-square-foot, 40-unit residential building with 44 parking spaces. The unit program includes three Very Low-Income and three Moderate-Income units.

Mobility & Traffic Engineering records an estimate of 204 net new daily trips and says further VMT impact analysis is not required under the City's stated threshold because the project is below 250 daily trips. The division nevertheless requires baseline volume and speed data on Lafayette Place and Braddock Drive and analysis of current and anticipated traffic volumes and speeds.

Public Works conditions include a four-foot alley dedication, alley repaving, reconstruction of the alley approach, replacement of sidewalk along Braddock Drive and Lafayette Place, two new street trees on Lafayette Place, undergrounding of new utility lines, and a Construction Traffic Management Plan.

The Mobility & Traffic Engineering conditions require four short-term bicycle parking racks in the public right-of-way and a sight-visibility triangle at the alley/Braddock Drive corner.

The Planning conditions require replacement-unit compliance and an affordable-housing agreement if a density bonus is approved, with restricted affordable units subject to long-term affordability requirements stated in the source.

Cultural Affairs states that the project triggers the City's Art in Public Places Program, subject to the valuation and exemption calculations described in the document.

Navigate the archive

Linked records

Direct links named in this record: people, organizations, properties, projects, events and other canonical archive records.

More context

Related records

Ranked by documented overlap such as a shared project, property, person, organization, event, relationship, or an explicit link between records.

Archive indexing

Record tags

Use these archive labels to follow related people, organizations, subjects and records across Culver City Records.

Context note

The document records City staff comments and preliminary conditions across Planning, Building Safety, Fire/Community Risk Reduction, Public Works Engineering, Mobility & Traffic Engineering, Environmental Programs & Operations, Cultural Affairs and Transportation. It does not identify the applicant, property owner or developer by name. CCR therefore leaves those fields unresolved rather than inferring them. The source states that a Planning Commission public hearing would be scheduled after the application is deemed complete; this record does not establish any later completeness determination, hearing, approval or construction start.