relationship

Southern California Hospital Hazard-Pay Ordinance - Lawsuit, Council Votes, and Alleged SEIU Communications

2021-06-22 2021 Complaint allegations and quoted communications documented
At a glance

The hospital's June 22, 2021 federal complaint challenged Culver City's Premium Hazard Pay ordinance and set out a detailed chronology of collective bargaining, council deliberations, and communications involving city officials and SEIU personnel. The complaint says the ordinance required an additional $5 per hour for covered hospital workers for 120 days and was adopted 3-2 on June 14, 2021.

Litigation and documented-communications relationship Primary complaint; allegations distinguished from findings
What the record shows

Key facts

Documented amounts
$5 per hour · 120 days
Federal Case
2:21-cv-05052
Ordinance Adopted
2021-06-14
Vote
3-2
Plaintiff
Southern California Healthcare System, Inc. d/b/a Southern California Hospital at Culver City
Evidence

Primary source

Navigate the archive

Linked records

Direct links named in this record: people, organizations, properties, projects, events and other canonical archive records.

More context

Related records

Ranked by documented overlap such as a shared project, property, person, organization, event, relationship, or an explicit link between records.

Archive indexing

Record tags

Use these archive labels to follow related people, organizations, subjects and records across Culver City Records.

Context note

The complaint alleges that SEIU Regional Political Director Maky Peters supplied draft ordinance language and draft advocacy material to Vice Mayor Daniel Lee and communicated with Lee, Mayor Alex Fisch, and Councilmember Yasmine-Imani McMorrin; it also quotes a May 21 email from SEIU Lead Organizer Shelbi Augustus concerning legal support and describes Lee's response. These are allegations presented by the hospital, although the complaint quotes communications it says were produced under the Public Records Act. The complaint further records Senior Deputy City Attorney Lisa Vidra's contrary position: she rejected the hospital's claim that SEIU's support created a gift or quid pro quo and stated that drafting assistance aimed at legislation was not a campaign contribution. The City Council vote described in the complaint was Fisch, Lee, and McMorrin in favor, with Eriksson and Vera opposed. CCR should preserve both the allegation and the documented counter-position rather than converting the complaint into a finding of misconduct.